A judge tossed out a lawsuit by rap producer Dr. Dre claiming that his former label, Death Row Records, violated his rights of trademark and publicity by releasing a new version of his iconic album “The Chronic.”
In analyzing the case, California District Court Judge Christina Snyder ruled that the alterations to the album were “minor and inconsequential.” In addition, the image used on the cover jacket is the same photograph from the original album, instead of a more current photo, which may have implied Dr. Dre’s endorsement. Specifically, the judge weighed the question of whether the changes to Dr. Dre’s album were more than “cosmetic.”
In doing so, he claims it violated his rights of trademark and publicity. The record label, however, said it only made slight adjustments, giving the album sonic clarity and a slightly louder volume.
But the judge allowed a second claim by Dr. Dre, that he hasn’t been paid royalties, to go forward.
The rapper-producer claims he has not pocketed any of the royalties since he split with Death Row, in 1996.
“The Chronic” was a hit and sold more than three million copies.
Apparently, Dr. Dre had an oral agreement granting the label a non-exclusive license to release sound recordings in exchange for an 18 percent royalty rate. Now the rapper will go after the money allegedly owed to him.
- Dr. Dre sues over unpaid ‘Chronic’ royalties (Associated Press)
- Rapper Dr. Dre loses claims against former label (Reuters)
- Rap Producer Dr. Dre Sues Death Row Records for Royalties (FindLaw)
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
