Sherrie Gavan was just trying to protect her son, Clayton. The teen had started using heroin in high school, and the family had done all it could to keep him clean. They even sent him away to live with relatives, and watched him like a hawk when he was home.
It wasn’t enough.
Gavan has pointed the finger at a 20-year-old neighbor, according to Fox News. He would reintroduce heroin into her son’s life while he was getting clean. She wanted him to stop.
During the confrontation, he began to reach for something in his car, reports the station. She panicked and smacked him. He called the police.
If these facts are true, Sherrie Gavan may be able to claim self-defense. In Missouri, self-defense requires a defendant to have:
Given public perception of drug dealers as violent offenders, it was arguably reasonable for Gavan to believe the man was reaching for a gun. It was also reasonable for her believe that physical force was necessary to disarm or distract him. Physical force is also minimal when compared to a firearm.
- reasonably believed she was in imminent danger of harm;
- reasonably believed force was necessary to defend herself from that harm; and
- used a reasonable amount of force to prevent or stop that harm.
Even if this argument doesn’t work in her favor, Sherrie Gavan will likely receive much sympathy from a judge or jury. Few people will severely punish a woman trying to keep a drug dealer away from her teenage son.
Related Resources:
- Factors Considered in Determining Sentences (FindLaw)
- Assault and Battery Defenses (FindLaw)
- Pad Thai Slapper Not Guilty for Trader Joe’s Fight (FindLaw’s Legally Weird)
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules