The Supreme Court has rejected a petition by convicted murderer Charles Hood for a hearing which he hoped would result in a new trial. Hood claimed that the affair carried on between the judge and the prosecutor in his case violated his right to a fair trial. The Court denied Hood’s petition without comment.
In 2008, during the legal proceedings around re-sentencing, Holland and O’Connell admitted the affair. However, as Reuters reports, they say it ended in 1987, three years before Holland’s trial. The AP writes the affair was reportedly and “open secret” in Collin County legal circles. Regardless of the timing, Hood’s attorneys felt the relationship amounted to a unconstitutional violation of Hood’s rights.
“No one should be prosecuted for a parking ticket let alone for capital murder by the district attorney who has had a sexual affair with the judge handling the case and despite the Court’s decision today, we will continue to zealously represent Mr. Hood as we believe his case was marred by a fundamental injustice,” said Hood’s attorney, Andrea Keilen, director of the Texas Defender Service.
Hood’s attorneys petitioned the Supreme Court to hear the case after the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals dismissed the appeal, ruling Hood had waited too long in raising the issue of whether Holland had a conflict of interest and should have recused herself from the case.
Related Resources:
- Court Denies Texan’s Appeal Over DA-Judge Affair (AP, ABC News)
- Supreme Court rejects killer’s affair-based appeal (Reuters)
- Recusal (FindLaw’s LawBrain)
- Code of Judicial Conduct (FindLaw’s LawBrain)
- Constitutional Protections for Defendants (provided by The Law Office of Mallon and Tranger)
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
