DUI license plates, also known as whiskey plates, are an increasingly popular option for lawmakers seeking innovative ways to curb the DUI recidivism rate. They, however, give rise to a few constitutional questions.
Potential harassment should be at the center of the debate about whiskey plates. Constitutionally, a police officer can only stop a person if there is reasonable suspicion that they have committed or are committing a crime. For drivers, reasonable suspicion most often means some sort of vehicle or traffic violation, or erratic driving.
Arguably, DUI license plates encourage the police to stop impacted drivers more often–even without reasonable suspicion. A slight swerve to miss a pothole might be ignored for an ordinary driver, but for one with a whiskey plate, it may suddenly become suspicion of drunk driving. Even worse, an officer may point to the plate as reasonable suspicion unto itself, even though it doesn’t convey the current state of the driver.
Even if whiskey plates accomplish their intended goals, their implementation is just begging for someone to initiate a constitutional lawsuit.
Related Resources:
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
