Unlike such necessary state appendages as, perhaps the athletic department of a state-run school, the Pennsylvania SPCA felt the bite of the law on December 29th, when the state Supreme Court of Pennsylvania held it did not have the governmental protection of immunity against suits.
In this case, the practical outcome of a lack of protection from lawsuits will cost the SPCA about $54,000. The plaintiff in this case, not entirely free of blame herself, was the owner of 12 pit bulls which the SPCA confiscated due to malnourishment and injury, in January of 1999. Initially also hit with dog fighting charges, Snead tried to claim her dogs after those charges had been dropped but was told the dogs had already been put to sleep, something that did not actually happen until days later. Snead was later convicted of animal cruelty.
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court dismissed the lower court’s award of $100,000 in punitive damages finding there was no actual malice on the part of the ASPCA when it mistakenly informed Snead that her dogs were no longer alive. Snead says she is pleased with the outcome, but “all the money in the world is not going to bring my dogs back.” It is unfortunate that the money she used to litigate this in case was not used instead on the dogs’ care, an action which may have eliminated the necessity for all the of the resulting legal actions.
Related Resources:
- Pa.’s high court rejects SPCA’s claim of immunity from lawsuit (Philly.com)
- On Sovereign Immunity: Army Corps of Engineers Liable for Katrina Damage (FindLaw’s Decided)
- Neighbor Disputes: Animals (FindLaw)
- Personal Injury - An Overview (provided by Kenney & Conley PC)
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
