Imagine that you’re a judge who was threatened by a litigant in one of your cases.  Faster than you could hit your gavel to the bench, I’m guessing that you’d pick up the phone and call some law enforcement folks to investigate things.

But if the person who threatened you, or your judicial colleagues, was prosecuted in your court, do you think they would get a fair trial?

A federal judge in Chicago doesn’t think so.

Defendant Hal Turner is an avowed White Supremacist well known for his anti-Semitic and anti-immigrant views.

It’s an interesting twist that Judge Walter sent Turner’s case to federal court in Brooklyn, NY (U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York).  Brooklyn is an American melting-pot of immigrants from around the world, an amalgam of different religions, races, nationalities, and ethnic groups. 

In short, a Brooklyn jury of Turner’s peers would represent the very essence of cultural diversity and tolerance that Turner opposes.

 

  • Trial Moved for NJ Blogger Accused of Threats, (AP) (Sept. 8, 2009)
  • The Case of Hal Turner: A Blog Post About Violence Tests the First Amendment, by Julie Hilden, FindLaw’s Writ (Jul. 27, 2009)
  • “Turner in His Own Words,” Anti-Defamation League (Jan. 17, 2008)
  • Lawyer: FBI Trained Hal Turner As An “Agent Provocateur,” Hartford Courant (Aug. 19, 2009)

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Civil Rights

Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court

Criminal

Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records

Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules